Central Indiana REACT-CERT

News and Information

Home
About Us
REACT
CERT
Events Page
Roadside Assistance / Travelers Aid
Contact Us
FRS - FRS/GMRS
Amateur Radio
Search and Rescue
Sky Warn
Fire
Affiliated Organizations
News and Information
Certifications / Training
Volunteer Organizations
County Emergency Management
Getting Involved
Meeting Minutes
Application for Membership
Member E-Mail
REACT, CERT, FEMA, Homeland Security, & EMA
News and Information

fema.gif

On This Page You Will Find The Following Articles:

.

1. REACT Launches Massive Nationwide  FRS Radio Safety Campaign

2.  FCC FRS Training Module

3. NIMS and ICS: From Compliance to Competence Indiana

4. National Incident Management System Training and You

5. 10 Citizen Preparedness Recommendations

6. REACT's  Website of the Month for September 2008

divider2.gif

REACT Launches Massive Nationwide
FRS Radio Safety Campaign

 

REACT International, Inc., National SOS and Midland Radio, have joined forces to create the Preparedness Partnership. It is a huge, on-going, nationwide safety program to provide Americans with inexpensive Family Radio Service (FRS) walkie-talkies for emergencies.


When cell phones, home phones and power go down in severe weather, floods, blizzards or other emergencies, many people are left with no means of communication. FRS can help fill that serious gap.
Tiny, simple FRS walkie-talkies enable neighbors to check on one another from the safety of their homes. FRS can help people avoid panic or isolation by enabling them to communicate with nearby friends. FRS will also enable them to seek help from those neighbors, if needed.


REACT International has undertaken to offer Midland FRS walkie-talkies at minimal cost so Americans can keep in touch during emergencies. For $10.99, which includes shipping and handling, REACT will provide a quality Midland FRS/GMRS radio, a simplified owner’s manual, and operating tips to get best results in emergencies. That FRS radio will become a vital part of any family’s emergency kit.

After hurricanes Katrina, Gustav and Ike, REACT and National SOS determined that FRS radios could help alleviate some of the misery and confusion, REACT International president Don Manlove explained. Midland,s support has made the Preparedness Partnership a reality. It will improve family safety nationwide in emergencies.


For more details on the REACT FRS radio offer, visit the newly unveiled web page found at www.REACTIntl.org/REACT-Radios

Contact:

Ron McCracken, PR Chairman
REACT International, Inc.,
Phone: 905-476-5556
E-Mail: publicity1@reactintl.org

l013.gif

FCC FRS Training Module

 

From the React-L List

 

Score Two for REACT

 

Sunday, August 24, 2008 8:26 PM

 

From: "Ronald McCracken" ronmccr@hotmail.com

 

Did you get a look yet at the FRS training module FCC just issued? It will do your heart good. [ Link  http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/clearinghouse/cert.html ] [You have to scroll down]

 

Near the end of Part 2 in the PowerPoint presentation, REACT is cited for its GMRS repeater system which is so valuable in emergencies. At the end of Part 2, REACT is again one of the "Further Resources" cited.

[ Link http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/cert-radiopt2revised10oct07.ppt  ]

 

Nice recognition from FCC or Fairfax ARES or both. Have a look. Bask in your well-deserved fame, just for a moment or two. Then, off to the next REACT assignment on behalf of your community.

 

Ron McCracken,

PR Chairman

l013.gif

l013.gif

 

NIMS and ICS: From Compliance to Competence Indiana

NIMS and ICS: From Compliance to Competence provided by:

<http://articles.directorym.net/NIMS_and_ICS_From_Compliance_to_Competence_Indiana-r878683-Indiana.html >

 

 

In February 2003, President George W. Bush issued Homeland Security Presidential Directive No. 5 (HSPD-5), which mandated the development of the National Incident Management System (NIMS), including the Incident Command System (ICS). “Compliance” would become an essential element of future life, including eligibility for homeland security grant funding and other federal largesse.

 

What resulted—to the point of overloading the training and certification infrastructure at the U.S. Fire Administration’s online training center—was a frenzy of computer-based training and certification, as providers logged in to complete ICS 100, 200, 700 and 800. Leaders and planners convened to change the terminology of their jurisdictions’ emergency-operations plans, making them, too, “NIMS-compliant.”

 

The good news now: Many, if not most, of our agencies are now NIMS-compliant. The bad news: Many of us have the illusion that we are also NIMS-competent. But those who actually manage incidents on the street have, in many jurisdictions, observed that in practice, little has changed. Practitioners have either refused to change the way they’ve done business for years, or they’ve continued the same old practices with a different vocabulary. Our colleagues in the fire service continue to be the most proficient users of the Incident Command System, because they use it more than EMS or law enforcement agencies.

 

WHAT IT TAKES

To become ICS-competent, an EMS agency must make a concerted effort to develop and improve its competence in the use of the techniques, tools, practices and vocabulary of ICS. There are several components of such an effort:

Policy and procedure—The agency will have to develop policies concerning training, implementation and evaluation of ICS.

 

Time and tools—The agency will have to devote staff time to training and provide the tools necessary for on-scene ICS. This means radios, vests and incident management boards for every vehicle. Most agencies will require sessions with outside trainers to build momentum.

 

Walk the talk—Chief officers will need to work hard to develop their own ICS competence. You will be unable to motivate your line staff to utilize good ICS at street level if your command officers are not observed to be ICS-competent at larger incidents.

 

Interagency relations—An EMS agency that has not previously involved itself in ICS, but rather stood back and allowed fire and police to manage incidents no matter the nature will have an awkward time when it begins to “do ICS.” There will be reactions ranging from surprise to resistance when, for the first time, an EMS unit arrives on a scene, provides a size-up and assumes command. Leadership needs to deal with interagency friction in advance, and be prepared to deal with whatever may result on a day-to-basis. Remember, we’re all required to do ICS in the post-HSPD-5 era.

 

TRAINING

Computer-based ICS training does not translate well to implementation in the field. An agency needs to devote some training time to ICS. An orderly process will be needed to move from the awareness provided by computerized ICS courses to proficiency in implementation. We think in terms of “crawl, walk, run,” but we may be more successful if we “crawl, crawl a little faster, walk with support,” etc. This requires:

 

Training in the practical application of the policy or procedure—Lecture/demonstration will be needed to introduce the new standard to the staff and demonstrate how it should be applied. Creative use of video, incident radio recordings, etc., may make what could be a dry session more interesting.

Tabletop or classroom activities with hands-on use of radios, vests and command boards—Facilitators inject scenarios, provide resources, etc. For a first step, try a tabletop that involves managing a three-car crash with four patients. Keep it simple, and don’t inject so many confounders that you eliminate the possibility of success.

 

Live scenarios—Again, keep them small and encourage success. To add some realistic interaction, recruit police and fire officers as simulators.

Larger scenarios and interagency exercises—These will be important, but don’t move to larger problems until you’ve become good at solving the smaller ones.

 

THE LINGO COUNTS

In order for officers and trainers to be aware of current incident management practices they should regularly observe practices at emergency scenes, monitor radio traffic and provide feedback to those engaged in the process.

Successful integration with other services will require demonstration of competence. EMS providers can’t expect acceptance by their fire service and law enforcement colleagues in an ICS situation if the EMS personnel can’t use ICS terminology correctly. It is an ongoing effort to banish the terms Medical Command and EMS Command from my EMS system’s vocabulary, even though everyone demonstrates on ICS tests that they know there’s only one Command for each incident.

 

If you experience larger incidents, conduct formal post-incident analyses or critiques. Get the radio tapes and pictures and video from the media, and walk through the ICS elements. Develop lists of “take away” or learning points that can be shared throughout the agency.

 

THE WAKE COUNTY EXPERIENCE

Wake County (NC) EMS Division is an all-paramedic county public safety division with 130 full-time employees operating 15 units 24/7 and three peak-activity units 12 hours a day. The service runs 9-1-1 emergency calls only, and handled about 38,000 requests for service last year in Raleigh (the state capital and county seat), several smaller municipalities and some unincorporated portions of the county. The service area is approximately 340 square miles and home to about 450,000.

 

Several major events throughout 2005–06 heightened our focus on good incident management skills. A train wreck involving 182 passengers, a large NDMS and evacuee reception operation following hurricanes Katrina and Rita, a large hazardous-materials incident that required evacuation of a nursing home, and several smaller events helped focus our attention on this important subject.

At the same time, Chief John McGrath took the helm of the Raleigh Fire Department, which is our primary medical coresponder. A 30-year veteran of the Philadelphia Fire Department and participant in some of its most notable major emergencies, McGrath is a huge proponent of ICS excellence and responder safety. Wake County EMS and Raleigh Fire enjoy an outstanding working relationship on the street as well as in the administrative suites. Chief McGrath and I agreed that we would work together to enhance our organizations’ ICS capability.

 

One of the first initiatives was a commitment to practice ICS on every incident. This practice, which seems to have originated in Phoenix, calls for providing a size-up and establishing Command on every call. The theory is that you can’t get good at ICS for “the big one” unless you use the skills, tools and vocabulary every day. This was initially met with a little resistance and a lot of good-natured teasing, but it continues today.

A second initiative was the development of joint advanced ICS training programs for public-safety supervisors. While ICS 100 and 200 can be taken online, ICS 300 and 400 require classroom participation. Wake County EMS worked with both RFD and the Wake County Fire-Rescue Division (a central service provider for the 20-plus municipal and private volunteer fire departments in the county) to develop and deliver advanced ICS courses for all of the public-safety and other involved disciplines. These occur on an ongoing basis, with initial delivery through 2006–07. Law enforcement, fire and EMS supervisors train with the same officers with whom they will actually manage incidents.

A third initiative involved procuring and providing ICS tools to units that didn’t have them. For Wake County EMS, which already provides its staff with head-to-toe NFPA 1999/1951-compliant (EMS and USAR) turnout gear, that meant procuring and using the following items:

Helmet shields that reflect unit assignments for all EMS personnel;

“Passport” personnel accountability tags for all EMS personnel and vehicles;

Initial incident command boards for all EMS units, and larger command boards and accountability boards for EMS supervisor and chief officer units;

 

ICS vest kits for all EMS units (Command, Medical, Triage, Treatment and Transportation), and larger kits for EMS supervisor and chief officer units (the above, plus Operations, Plans, Safety and Logistics).

 

At the same time, Wake County EMS took delivery of a new major-operations support unit, Truck 1, which has both mass-casualty and responder-rehabilitation capabilities. Truck 1 is dispatched to all incidents with MCI or prolonged-operations potential (including greater alarm fires). In addition to medical care equipment, it carries fans, “cooling chairs,” electrolyte drink mix and equipment for medical monitoring, including for carbon monoxide exposure. The capabilities of this unit, and the commitment to our response partners that it represents, have further contributed to improved major emergency operations.

 

A fourth initiative involves ongoing monitoring, observation, feedback and continuous learning. Senior officers responding to incidents will allow, as resources permit, more junior officers to remain in ICS positions while they assist, observe and coach. This allows line officers to gain valuable experience and confidence as ICS practitioners. Each incident is documented with an after-action report, and major incident highlights are periodically collated and presented to all system members as part of continuing education programs.

 

The result of these efforts has been an improving incident management climate. EMS officers are integral elements of the command and general staff at major emergencies, and functions and tasks that were often overlooked or addressed late in the game are addressed earlier, to the benefit of citizens and responders alike. This growing comfort with interagency incident management and safety has set the stage for Wake County EMS’s latest operational initiative: the high-rise fire scene rehabilitation protocol. Instead of establishing rehab at the lobby level, EMS medics will establish it at the fire service forward operating post, two floors below the fire. This will make prompt medical intervention more readily available to firefighters and reduce firefighter fatigue by limiting the time and climbing necessary to return to work after rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Although the terms “EMS” and “ambulance service” are often used interchangeably, they are not. An ambulance service runs ambulance calls, and the final product is the transportation of a patient to a hospital for further care. EMS, on the other hand, includes but is not limited to ambulance transportation. EMS includes medical care activities not related to transportation, including mass gatherings, medical support of technical-rescue operations and competent and meaningful participation in management of community incidents. If your organization stands back, waits for someone else to bring you patients and doesn’t participate in incident management and other activities that don’t directly relate to patient transportation, it is probably an ambulance service. If you are an EMS agency, you must be ICS-competent, engaged in managing your community’s major incidents, and a strong partner with your community’s law enforcement and fire suppression agencies.

 

If you call yourself EMS and your community looks to you to be there when there’s a crisis, you owe it to them to be ICS competent.

 

Author: By Skip Kirkwood, MS, JD, EMT-P, EFO

Skip Kirkwood, MS, JD, EMT-P, EFO, is Chief of Emergency Medical Services for the Wake County (NC) Department of Public Safety. Contact him at skip.kirkwood@co.wake.nc.us

l013.gif

National Incident Management System Training and You

 

< http://www.iacop.org/pdfs/NIMS_Information_Article_11-15-07.pdf >

The Indiana Department of Homeland Security has received many inquiries during the past months regarding the levels of training required for NIMS compliance.

Many questions center around how best to determine who should attend which level of training to be compliant. Keep in mind there are several components affecting NIMS compliance, in this article we are going to focus solely on the training issues associated

with the NIMS program guidance.

We should first look at the legal issues associated with NIMS compliance.

USDHS Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 (2-28-2003) set the direction for the nationwide implementation of NIMS for the federal government. Federal Occupational

Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements under 29CFR 1910.120 and compliance directive CPL:02-02-073, dated 8-27-2007, have established the requirement that the Incident Command System be used during incidents covered by these directives be NIMS compliant. This also applies to EMS personnel and First Receivers in hospital departments. Governor Daniels has directed state compliance to NIMS in Executive

Order 05-09. It is important to note that while local agencies are not legally bound to comply with NIMS metrics, it is a requirement to receive federal or state public safety related funding. Additionally, with the adoption of NIMS compliant Incident Command procedures by OSHA, we recommend that departments consult their legal advisor about any potential liability that may be incurred by failing to become NIMS compliant and properly implementing the approved Incident Command System.

Federal Fiscal Year 2006 grant requirements called for states and local jurisdictions to adopt NIMS by executive order, proclamation, resolution, or legislation.

During that period, the State of Indiana and every Indiana county agreed through some type of documentation that they have complied with this requirement. The FFY2007

NIMS compliance included the completion of IS-700, ICS-100 and ICS 200 as a Tier 1 requirement (mandatory) for the appropriate level of personnel specified in the guidance.

These requirements were defined as “Tier 1” or required for compliance. Tier 1 metrics and questions were deemed critical to measuring FFY07 compliance. The Tier 1 metrics are derived from previously established NIMS requirements and are fundamental to the success of NIMS implementation. The draft of the NIMS 5 year training plan (9-

6-2007), published by the NIMS Integration Center, shows that the completion of ICS-

300 and ICS-400 are scheduled to be Tier 1 requirements for FFY2008. Changes to this requirement have been suggested to the NIC by agencies representing various states and modifications to this requirement may be forthcoming. Guidance indicates that ICS-300 is required for middle and upper management and ICS-400 for those serving in Command and General Staff positions.

IDHS has the following suggestions for local departments as they address NIMS compliance training issues:

Each department has the responsibility to “self-select, self-certify, and self regulate”

which personnel attends which level of training. Much like OHSA compliance, NIMS compliance and justification is the responsibility of the department (employer). So the department head has the responsibility for identifying which staff member needs to complete which level. The department head is also responsible to be able to justify those decisions if challenged by USDHS or OSHA.

Agency heads must be aware of the types of incidents their personnel are trained to handle and be prepared to require the hand off of command at incidents they are not trained to handle. Just like EMS protocol requires, that a responder hand off patient care to someone with a higher level of training and capability, (i.e., an EMT-B turns over patient care to a Paramedic), an Incident Commander should turn over command authority to one more qualified when they arrive on scene.  The Incident Commander also has the responsibility to call in properly trained personnel if the incident exceeds their level of training and capability.

Incidents have been classified under NIMS typing as follows:

Type 5 – Under one operational period, minimum resources, the only ICS position staffed is the Incident Commander (i.e., single vehicle crash)

ICS-100, ICS-200, and IS-700 apply

Type 4 – Limited to one operational period, command and general staff positions activated as needed (i.e., house fire, protest rally).

ICS-100, ICS-200, and IS-700 apply, ICS-300 will apply when any command and general staff positions are activated.

Type 3 – May extend into multiple operational periods, some/all command and general staff positions activated (i.e., large industrial fire, tornado, hostage stand-off).

ICS-100, ICS-200, ICS-300, ICS-400, IS-800 and IS-700 apply

Type 2 – Multiple operational periods, many command and general staff positions filled, regional and/or national resources brought in (i.e., devastating flood or earthquake).

ICS-100, ICS-200, ICS-300, ICS-400, IS-800 and IS-700 apply

Type 1 – Expected to go into multiple operational periods, event of national significance (i.e., major terrorist attack like 9/11 or Katrina level disaster).

ICS-100, ICS-200, ICS-300, ICS-400, IS-800 and IS-700 apply

If an Incident Commander does not hand off command when not qualified to handle an incident, the Incident Commander may be making themselves legally responsible and/or personally liable for things that goes wrong or other failures (could be fined by OSHA or even be subject to a civil lawsuit).

If a department does not have anyone trained to the ICS-300 and ICS-400 level, then they are not qualified to manage a Type 3, Type 2, or Type 1 incident under the NIMS guidelines. The department could manage a Type 5 incident but if, during a Type 4, any command and general staff positions are activated then they are again not qualified to run the incident and would need to hand over command to a qualified person from another agency or to a qualified incident management team.

 

This appears to be supported in OSHA Compliance Directive CPL:02-02-

073 (August 27, 2007). Readers should research news articles regarding the fines imposed by OSHA, such as in connection with the Charleston, SC June 18, 2007 firefighter tragedy.

The IDHS Training Division has been supporting NIMS compliant ICS training for nearly three years. We continue to support ICS related training through a variety of means:

 

The Training Division will have completed at least one ICS-300 and one ICS-400 class in each homeland security district by the end of 2008.

There are currently more than 90 state recognized trainers (these are people who have completed the train-the-trainer course offered by IDHS) who are qualified to teach

ICS-100 through ICS-400.

The Training Division will have completed at least five train-the-trainer courses by

the end of 2008 which will help to increase the number of state recognized trainers to about 120 to 150.

 

The Center for Domestic Preparedness in Alabama, as well as the Emergency Management Institute and National Fire Academy in Maryland, offer training in ICS- 300 and ICS-400 at their training sites. They provide the travel, training, lodging, and meals to state and local organizations free of charge.

There are other trainers around the state who meet the instructor qualifications of the

NIMS Integration Center but have not completed the IDHS train-the-trainer course.

These instructors do not receive support or recognition from IDHS. They may conduct the training, but must retain their own training records and other required documentation to support a federal audit or legal challenge.

ICS-100, ICS-200, IS-700 and IS-800 are still available for free on-line through the

www.fema.gov  website

The Training Division’s plan for conducting NIMS/ICS training is to offer the latest courses as soon as they are released to us by FEMA in order to get a base of local responders qualified to attend a Train-the-Trainer course on the subject. Once the Train-the-Trainer courses become available, the Training Division then focuses half of our resources on offering courses and the other half on getting local instructors through the

Train the Trainer courses. When sufficient local instructors are available, then all instruction will be provided by the local trainers and the Training Division will move on to the next NIMS/ICS Tier 1 training requirement, repeating the process. We anticipate the release of Incident Management Team training courses and Command and General

Staff position specific courses in the future.

In conclusion, every public safety agency or department in the State of Indiana is responsible for first responder training based on the assigned duties their responders will be performing during an emergency. Response personnel should not perform any emergency response operation unless they have been trained to the level required by their job function or responsibility and have been determined by their department as having completed the necessary training. Failure to train is an often used legal challenge used against public safety agencies when incidents are not handled properly and fines from

OSHA or other regulatory agencies are levied for inadequate training or improper actions.

Each department should be aware of the different types of incidents and identify to which types of incident their agency is prepared to respond. If the department expects to only respond to Type 5 and Type 4 incidents, there is less need for them to have a person(s) trained in ICS-300 and ICS-400. However, this department should also be aware that if a

Type 3, Type 2, or Type 1 incident does occur in their jurisdiction, they would be expected to hand over the command of the incident to persons or an agency that is qualified to handle it. Otherwise, the department could be held legally responsible for things that went wrong or failures and could also face consequences from the

Occupational Safety and Health Standards Administration or other regulatory agency for non-compliance.

For more information, go to www.fema.gov or to www.in.gov/dhs  and click on the NIMS link. You may also contact the IDHS NIMS point of contact, David Barrabee at dbarrabee@dhs.in.gov  or contact the IDHS Training Division.

l013.gif

10 Citizen Preparedness Recommendations

(From “Washington Post” Article - 5/16/08)

 

Below are 10 recommendations, based on my research and experiences so far, I would suggest to help achieve a more prepared U.S. public. They are included in a May 18th, 2008 Washington Post “Outlook” article “It’s An Emergency: We’re Not Prepared” which can be found at (www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2008/05/16/AR2008051603735.html )

 

1. Make public preparedness a priority, or it won’t happen. Last year, [Former DHS Preparedness Undersecretary George] Foresman asked a ballroom full of state first responders how many of them had made a family emergency plan. Of 300 people, nine raised their hands. If many of the folks promoting civilian preparedness aren’t following their own advice, it’s no wonder that the rest of us aren’t, either. “It needs to be a national imperative,” says Joseph F. Bruno, New York City’s emergency management commissioner.

 

2. Make preparedness part of 21st-century citizenship. Being prepared may be the most significant contribution many citizens can make to their nation’s security. Not only are civilians likely to be the first first responders at any disaster scene, but the nation’s response will also be only as strong as that of the weakest link. And a new commitment to public preparedness would give the country a nonpartisan, substantive way of re-tapping the reservoir of post-9/11 goodwill. “We don’t ask enough of people,” says one city emergency manager. “Everyone asks me, ‘How are you going to take care of us in a disaster?’ You have a big role in taking care of you.”

 

3. Don’t laugh at “duck and cover.” The nation’s Cold War civil defense campaign is often parodied, but it offers helpful lessons for the present. “We threw the baby out with the bathwater,” says R. David Paulison, administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. “We need to get back the preparedness ethic from our past.” In the 1950s, U.S. air defense had more than 100,000 civilian volunteers and thousands of observation posts (including my grandmother, Jeannette, an observer in the Bronx). We don’t need that many people looking up at the skies, but we could use that type of citizen interest and engagement.

 

4. Knowledge is power. Just about every emergency official I’ve interviewed says that public education could help mitigate the impact of a catastrophic disaster. The idea isn’t to overwhelm the citizenry with too much information but to tell people what they really need to know — so that, for example, they’ll understand the difference between a “dirty bomb” and a nuclear bomb with even a fraction of their ability to differentiate between Britney and Paris. In fact, experts believe that a “dirty bomb,” a traditional explosive laced with radiation, is a likely terrorist weapon in part because it could have a psychological impact far beyond its actual physical damage — particularly if people haven’t been briefed in advance.

 

5. We should tell the children. Like fire safety and seat belts, emergency preparedness may ultimately take a generation to take hold. So we need to include young people in the effort. We could make preparedness education part of the school curriculum by piggybacking on the successful fire or earthquake programs already in place. Going through kids makes it more likely that adults will follow. When my 5-year-old came home from school asking whether we were going to save the environment by getting new compact fluorescent bulbs, it sent me to the hardware store faster than any public service announcement.

 

6. Try the carrot and the stick. The government uses the bottom line when it wants to influence behavior. During hurricane season, the state of Louisiana provides a “tax holiday” for residents to purchase emergency supplies. Virginia will hold its first such holiday May 25-31. This could be replicated nationwide. Every year, I have to sign a form certifying that I have guards on my apartment windows. Could there be a similar form for having a family emergency plan? There are laws and insurance benefits for installing burglar and fire alarms; we could expand that to preparedness.

 

7. Bring in business to help make the sale. Marketing isn’t the public sector’s forte, and preparedness needs to be marketed as a consumer brand. A number of major corporations distinguished themselves in response to Katrina. It’s time to engage the private sector in advancing civilian preparation.

 

8. Use 21st-century technology to prepare for 21st-century emergencies. The use of camera phones, Twitter and Google map mash-ups after the Chinese earthquake and during last year’s Southern California wildfires are just the most recent examples of personal technology’s growing role in public emergency preparation and response. We need to make Americans more aware of the capabilities of the technology at their fingertips and integrate it better into disaster planning. Social networking sites, for instance, could help in finding family members in an emergency, but only if everyone in the family is networked and knows how to use them. Though I’m a 40-something who didn’t know “BFF” from “LOL,” I’m beginning to learn (with the help of my 8-year-old). My wife and I now know how to send text messages, which can sometimes get through when voice calls can’t (e.g., after the 2005 London subway bombings).

 

9. Everyone should learn the drill. The CERT hurricane drill in which I played a victim helped me think about what I’d do in an emergency. Drilling would help all Americans focus on and work through the questions everyone should ask in advance. (How will you get information and communicate with your family? Do you know the emergency plan of your children’s school?)

 

10. Create a National Preparedness Day. September was made National Preparedness Month in 2004, but sometimes more can be accomplished in 24 focused hours than in 30 diffuse days. Let’s have a day when we focus on this need — briefing citizens, conducting drills, filling emergency kits. A helpful model is Japan’s Disaster Prevention Day, held on the anniversary of the catastrophic 1923 Tokyo earthquake. Sept. 11 could be the official U.S. Preparedness Day: It would honor the memories of those who died by making sure that the United States is never so unprepared again.

 

 

History has shown that individuals will rise to the occasion in an emergency. But offering them the information, training, technology, support and encouragement to prepare in advance means that they’ll be in the best position to help themselves, their families and their community if — but probably when — that emergency arrives.

 

divider2.gif

Central Indiana REACT-CERTs Website Has Been Named

Website Of The Month By Mr. Ron McCracken,

 REACT Internationals Public Relations Chairman

 

[React-L] NPM Website of the Month

Wednesday, September 3, 2008 2:37 PM

From: "Ronald McCracken" ronmccr@hotmail.com

 

"Pay a visit to" www.reactindiana.org  "and see what ideas you would like to try. Enjoy what you learn. Drop the Team a note to let them know what you liked anytime you spy a good idea. They will appreciate the feedback. Perhaps you've already done that earlier."

 

"Thanks to those who keep sending along Team websites for this feature. Please keep them coming."

 

Ron McCracken,

PR Chairman

l013.gif
CNN News Link
CNNlogo.gif
National Weather Service Link
SWImage4.jpg
The Weather Channel Link
weatherlogo.jpg

Troops.gif